top of page

Why Your Agency's SEO Strategy is Missing the Pipeline Mark

  • Writer: Gil'ad Idisis
    Gil'ad Idisis
  • Jun 19
  • 6 min read

Updated: Aug 19


Your SEO agency delivered exactly what they promised: 300% organic traffic growth in six months. Your blog posts rank on page one for dozens of keywords. Your monthly numbers are flowing like the mighty Amazon River.

So why is your pipeline so bone dry?

Here’s the hard truth: your agency might be having you chase vanity traffic while your pipeline starves for customers.


It’s not intentional—most agencies genuinely want to drive results. But structural incentives and industry practices can turn their focus to metrics that look sexy but don’t pay the bills.


Why the Volume-First Approach Makes Sense (For Agencies)

Put yourself in your SEO agency’s shoes. They’re juggling dozens of clients, reporting progress monthly, and fighting for renewals against agencies promising bigger traffic spikes.


When an agency needs to prove they’re worth their fee, targeting high-volume keywords and pumping blog articles is their go-to move.


There's a separate discussion to be had on whether a blog is such a must-have for B2B startups. The thing is, that's the path of least resistance for them: They can point to concrete metrics: “We increased your organic traffic by 200% and improved rankings for 47 keywords.” These numbers dazzle execs and align with industry-standard scorecards.


The alternative—targeting narrow, high-intent keywords with lower search volumes—requires a tougher pitch. “We focused on buyer-specific terms that only get 500 monthly searches each, but these visitors are 10x more likely to convert” doesn’t scream instant wins, especially early on.


By the way, it's a very similar quality+intent/quantity+traffic conflict that pops up with backlinks strategy, where the easier short-term win is buying sponsored backlinks over investing more time and effort in a deeper backlink approach.


How B2B SEO Strategies Miss the Mark

The challenge arises when agencies prioritize clicks over conversions. Your agency might be nailing traffic goals but reeling in the wrong fish.


You sell customer analytics software for B2B companies. Your agency creates content around "data visualization tips" and "business intelligence basics" - attracting analysts looking for general advice. But your buyers (VP of Sales) aren't interested in that. If they're looking for anything at all, it's usually around longtail keywords with low volumes.


Why Agencies Chase Traffic Over Pipeline

Agencies aren’t trying to tank your pipeline—they’re trapped in a traffic-first trap set by industry norms and client demands.


The Traffic-First Trap

Reporting Deadlines: Monthly reports crave quick wins. Traffic spikes show up fast; pipeline growth lags.

Client Expectations: Clients, fed by industry hype, often demand traffic surges. Agencies deliver what’s asked, even when conversions matter more.

Competitive Pressure: When agencies pitch you, promising “X% traffic increase” beats vague “qualified leads” promises, and they can deliver. It's easy(er) to show a traffic bump after a month than seeing organic leads start to trickle in after three months of blood, sweat and tears.

Attribution Hurdles: Linking SEO to deals needs CRM integration and patience—resources agencies often lack.


Struggling to align your SaaS content strategy with actual buyer intent? I help B2B companies bridge the gap between SEO performance and pipeline contribution.


Schedule a 20-minute consultation to learn how I Can help.


The Case for Traffic-First SEO (And Why It's Not Always Wrong)

Let me be the devil's advocate for a second: Before dismissing volume-focused strategies entirely, it's worth understanding the legitimate reasons why agencies may prioritize traffic growth.


"Brand visibility compounds over time"

The Agency Argument: That junior developer reading "DevOps basics" today might be a CTO making purchasing decisions in 3 years. Every person who discovers your brand through educational content becomes part of your future consideration set.


Yes, but... are you knowingly budgeting for a 3-year payback period? Most startups need pipeline contribution within quarters, not years. If brand building is the primary strategy, it should be explicit in your content budget allocation—not a hidden assumption. You need to decide whether you're optimizing for this quarter's pipeline or next decade's brand recognition.


"Educational content builds domain authority"

The Agency Argument: Google rewards sites that comprehensively cover their topic area. Those high-volume educational posts improve your overall domain strength, which helps ALL your pages rank better—including your high-intent commercial content.


Yes, but... this assumes Google's algorithm weights broad topical coverage over user engagement signals. In reality, pages with terrible bounce rates and zero conversions can actually hurt your domain's perceived quality.


Authority built on irrelevant traffic is often hollow authority. If your educational content consistently shows poor engagement metrics, you might be signaling to Google that your site doesn't satisfy user intent.


"You underestimate buying committee influence"

The Agency Argument: Junior team members often influence vendor shortlists, so educating the broader team builds advocates throughout the organization. The VP of Engineering might make the final decision, but junior developers help shape the consideration set.


Yes, but... this works in some industries and completely backfires in others. Accountants don't need to be educated on "cash flow basics"—it's insulting to their expertise. Similarly, experienced CTOs at Series B companies aren't swayed by junior developers reading introductory content. Know your audience's sophistication level before assuming educational content builds credibility.

"Market expansion requires market education"

The Agency Argument: If you only target people already searching for your specific solution, you're fighting over the same small pool of in-market buyers as your competitors. Educational content creates new demand by helping prospects recognize problems they didn't know they had.

Yes, but... this is only true for emerging categories. If you're selling another project management tool or CRM platform, you're not creating new demand—you're competing for existing demand. Educational content in saturated markets often just subsidizes your competitors' conversion efforts. You're spending budget to educate prospects who then evaluate multiple vendors, including your competition.

The Real Question: Strategy or Default?

The issue isn't whether these justifications are valid—they often are. The issue is whether they're strategic choices or default assumptions. Are you consciously investing in long-term brand building, or are you accidentally optimizing for vanity metrics?

How to Fix Your B2B Content Strategy

If you suspect your SaaS content strategy’s off-target, here’s how to audit it:

  • Go back to the drawing board: Recheck your goals and metrics, and how they're connected to your business KPIs; Audit your content pillars and keep a tight feedback loop. For a full framework on building a content engine from scratch, see our Startup Content Strategy Playbook. Traffic Quality Check: In GA4, segment your organic blog traffic by engagement metrics. Look at pages per session, session duration, and conversion events. Pipeline-ready traffic digs deeper.

  • Keyword Intent Audit: Review your top-performing blog posts from an intent perspective. What percentage target educational vs. evaluative vs. commercial searches? Your SaaS content strategy should lean toward buyer-ready searches.

  • Sales Alignment: Share your top-performing content with your sales team. Do they recognize the problems discussed? Would they send these articles to prospects? If not, you aren’t hitting your ICP.

  • Path Tracking: Track which blog posts drive demo requests, trial signups, or sales conversations. You might find your top traffic posts are pipeline duds.

Steering Your Agency Toward Conversions

Rather than ditching your agency, reset expectations for a conversion-first approach:

  • Define success differently: Swap “100% traffic growth” for “50% more qualified organic leads.”

  • Share buyer intelligence: Your agency’s blind without your ICP. Provide detailed buyer personas, sales call insights, and top prospect profiles.

  • Establish conversion tracking: Implement tracking for demo requests, trial starts, or content downloads to focus on real results.

  • Balance volume and intent: Keep some traffic plays but prioritize high-intent topics.

  • Regular pipeline reviews: Schedule quarterly reviews to align SEO with pipeline, not just clicks. Keep priorities conversion-first.


The Bottom Line

Your SEO agency isn’t trying to sink your ship. They’re caught in industry standards, client expectations, and traffic-first traps.

But when you spell out that 1,000 qualified visitors matter more than 10,000 random clicks, solid agencies will pivot to pipeline. About the Author: Gilad Idisis is a B2B content strategist and marketing lead who’s helped SaaS companies scale authority content through AI-assisted workflows and deep product storytelling. Previously at Melio, Agora RE, currently at Checkmarx, and in my spare time, flying solo as the Logonaut.


Struggling to align your SaaS content strategy with actual buyer intent? I help B2B companies bridge the gap between SEO performance and pipeline contribution.


Schedule a 20-minute consultation to learn how I can help.



Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

Stay looped in for new articles fresh off the presses. No spam, no promotions. Pinky promise.

Logonaut logo
  • Whatsapp
  • LinkedIn

©2025 Gilad Idisis. All rights reserved.

bottom of page