Please Don’t Use a Template to Create Your B2B One-Pager (Here’s What to Do Instead)
- Gil'ad Idisis
- Sep 27
- 5 min read
Oh boy, how we love templates in the B2B marketing and sales world — and why wouldn’t we? They keep assets on-brand, ensure consistency, and speed up production. What’s not to love?
That is… until we get to the one-pager. Here, building off a template is the fastest way to kill its effectiveness. A one-pager represents an intimate moment of communication between your company and a lead. It’s where your enthusiastic SDR or AE looks them in the eye and makes a human connection.
Some marketers argue that one-pagers are dead. Their critique is fair: most one-pagers are superficial, overstuffed, or misused. But here’s the counterpoint: the problem isn’t the one-pager format, but rather treating it like a static template.
Using a templated one-pager is like going on a great date and then following up with a love letter that says: “Dear Mr./Ms., I had a great time at the occasion at the place. Here are some of the feelings I might have for you.”
A one-pager is a powerful persuasion tool, and a building block in your content strategy — a bridge between curiosity and commitment.
Treat it like a fill-in-the-blank document, and you don’t just lose the human connection your team worked to build — you also miss the lead’s context, their unique pain points, their stage in the journey, and the next step they need to take.
That’s how you turn one of the sharpest deal-closing tools into a dud, and win deals not because of your 1-pager, but despite it.
The Paradigm Shift: From One-Size-Fits-All to Contextual, Living Docs
The real alternative to templates isn’t “make better templates.” It’s a paradigm shift.
Old Paradigm: One-pagers as static artifacts. Marketing builds one master PDF, and it gets sent everywhere. Consistent, yes. Relevant, rarely.
New Paradigm: One-pagers as contextual, living documents. Each version adapts to the role it’s meant for, the stage of the deal, type of org (size and industry), and the objections in play. It’s not a single finished file — it’s a flexible output that changes shape depending on the moment.
Once you buy into the new paradigm, how you execute depends on resources and maturity:
A small team might manually tailor for top accounts.
A growing org might use modular templates with swappable sections.
A scale-up might automate it — building a dynamic one-pager generator with AI.
Tailoring Your B2B One-Pager by Context
Context is where the one-pager lives or dies. Here’s how tailoring of your 1-pager shifts depending on the situation and context:
Context | Tailoring Approach |
New or Complex Features | Prioritize clarity. Use workflows, diagrams, or “how it works” callouts. |
Mature Features in Crowded Markets | Lead with ROI and differentiation. “40% faster time-to-value than industry standard.” |
User-Facing Features | Show, don’t tell. Screenshots, UX highlights, and user testimonials. |
Technical Personas (CTO / Architect) | Specs, integrations, scalability, security, TCO. Bullet it out. |
Finance Personas (CFO / Procurement) | Cost savings, budget fit, ROI and TTV calculators. |
Internal Champions | Equip them with objection rebuttals, talking points, and success examples they can re-use internally. |
Company Size / Maturity | Startup → agility, speed, low overhead; Enterprise → compliance, integrations, scale, global support. |
Industry Vertical | Regulated industries → compliance/audits; Consumer tech → UX and adoption; Manufacturing/logistics → uptime and reliability. |
Risk Profile / Trigger | Breach/outage → urgency and mitigation; Growth trigger → scalability; Cost-cutting → efficiency and automation. |
Audience Sophistication | Non-technical exec → analogies and outcomes; Hands-on evaluator → deep dives, specs, detailed proof points. |
Competitive Displacement | Lead with differentiation; anticipate competitor strengths; handle objections; show switcher proof; make migration safe. |
Distribution Channel | Field sales leave-behind → visuals, talking points; Website download → SEO hooks/gated CTA. |
Region / Cultural Factors | North America → bold claims and ROI; EMEA → compliance and risk mitigation; APAC → growth, agility, local case studies. |
Tailored CTA by Readiness | Awareness → “Learn more”; Consideration → “See case study/ROI”; Decision → “Demo/migration plan.” |
The factors and considerations change based on your own company and product. The point is that every one-pager is contextual. It doesn’t exist in a vacuum — it exists in a moment of persuasion.
All of these variables only matter if you can put them to work. Here’s how I’d turn tailoring into a repeatable process inside an LLM project.
My Optimal 1-Pager Process (With AI Assistance)
Manual tailoring works, but it drains resources. Modular templates help, but they’re still clunky.
The most economical route over time is to use AI as your asset library and assembly line. It takes an upfront investment of time and effort, but once it’s up and running, you’ll wish you’d done it sooner.
Here’s the process I’d run:
Step 1: Set up your project
Create a dedicated workspace/project (call it One-Pager Engine).
Define the structure: headline → differentiators → proof → objections (if competitive) → CTA.
Add brand rules: tone, banned phrases, mandatory mentions (e.g., GDPR in EMEA).
Assign an owner to update and maintain the project.
Step 2: Build your dataset
This is the pantry the LLM will pull from. Each row should tie a product feature to its benefit and the context where it matters most. Tag rows so the model knows when to use them.
Include:
Feature (e.g., “HubSpot integration,” “Real-time code scanning”)
Value prop (“Cut lead leakage by 22%,” “Reduce remediation time by 40%”)
Proof (customer quote, ROI stat, analyst mention)
Persona relevance (CTO = scalability, CFO = cost savings, end-user = UX)
Use case (leave-behind vs. pre-meeting)
Context (standard vs. competitive displacement)
Trigger (“why now”) (breach, growth, cost-cutting, renewal)
Region/industry nuance (compliance for EMEA, uptime for logistics, UX for consumer tech)
CTA options (demo, ROI calculator, case study)
Example row:
Feature | Value Prop | Persona | Context | Trigger | Region | Proof | CTA |
HubSpot integration | “Connect marketing + sales in minutes” | CFO | Competitive | Growth | NA | Acme Co. cut lead leakage by 22% | “See integration demo” |
Important note: Let a skilled content writer write the copy (or adjust it into a 1-pager format from other assets) for any block that is meant to be presentable - i.e., value-props, objection-handling, etc.
Step 3: Clarify the intent to the LLM
Don’t just say “write a one-pager.” Instead:
“Build a one-pager for a CFO in EMEA, decision stage, competitive displacement vs. Contoso, cost-cutting trigger. Use only the content blocks that match, as-is, with only neccassary adjustemnts for flow.”
Step 4: Run by scenario
Now marketing or sales can request tailored outputs for live opportunities:
“Give me a one-pager for a CTO in NA, awareness stage, regulated industry, growth trigger.”
“Build a one-pager for a CFO in EMEA, decision stage, competitive displacement vs. Contoso, cost-cutting trigger.”
The LLM pulls the right blocks and assembles them into the structure.
Step 5: Review & deploy
Marketing checks tone and accuracy.
Sales enablement uploads or shares it with reps.
Everyone reuses the same dataset — no reinventing the wheel.
Result: a contextual one-pager in under an hour — often in minutes (minus design).
Wrapping Up
One-pagers only work if they’re fast to produce and specific to the deal in front of you. Setting up a simple project with a dataset of features, benefits, and proof points takes some effort, but it pays back every time sales needs something tailored by tomorrow morning.
And one-pagers are just one side of the coin. When you need to go deeper and show real outcomes, you’ll lean on case studies. I’ve broken down my process for writing high-performing case studies here.
Together, they give your team quick hits for the short game and depth for the long game, without burning cycles on endless rewrites.





Comments